home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: uni-paderborn.de!usenet
- From: laire@basis.owl.de (Ralph Schmidt)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
- Subject: Re: FindTask() VERY IMPORTANT
- Date: 13 Mar 1996 15:51:57 GMT
- Organization: Universitaet Paderborn, Germany
- Message-ID: <4i6qut$imf@news.uni-paderborn.de>
- References: <607.6646T688T1561@horus.co.jyu.fi> <4i1bja$59t@oak28.doc.ic.ac.uk>?<4hfvff$sj6@werple.net.au>?<192.6637T931T2098@academy.bastad.se>?20@ <4hm7qm$otm@news.uni-paderborn.de>?<MlDlTdS00iWS45Xc5x@andrew.cmu.edu>?<4hni69$8ub@tempo.univ-lyon1.fr>?<4i1nat$e5s@news.uni-paderborn.de>?@ne╨
- NNTP-Posting-Host: basis.owl.de
- In-Reply-To: <607.6646T688T1561@horus.co.jyu.fi>
- X-Newsreader: NewsFlash [$Revision: 2.104 $] NF-U-00029
-
- On 03/13/96, Aki Laukkanen wrote:
- >
- >>And guess what...in the next major OS Version you won┤t see any
- >>fields in the execbase.h/.i structure. Rules change.
- >>And to avoid another senseless debate...yes old 68000 code still can
- >>use the execbase fields...for powerpc programs it will be forbidden.
- >>New 68000 code may also use the new API but that depends on the
- >>availibility of a new 68000 exec module.
- >
- >Aren't we all glad that you care to drop a few lines of information?
- Wouldn't
- >we be in heaven if we actually got something in black and white and
- nicely
- >formatted please?
- >
-
- I only told these things to show in which kind of direction
- we┤ll go. Hide implementation details as much as possible..direkt
- structure peeking for execbase for example will be forbidden
- for PPC programs.
- When the specification are finalized we won't hide these but
- today these specification aren't finalized.
-
-
-
- --
- --
- Ralph Schmidt,laire@popmail.owl.de,NextMail welcome
-